In
today’s society we place an extraordinary amount of emphasis on appearance.
What it means to have a healthy body both internally and externally. Or at
least what appears to be a healthy body on the outside. The dictionary definition of health is “the
state of being free from illness or injury.” While there is some truth to this,
we go further as a society in expanding this simple definition. A healthy body
is able and active but most importantly it is natural and proportionate. One of
the most important things for maintaining a healthy body is to eat well, drink
lots of water, and avoid artificial things that may cause harm or push your body
to the limit. Body building and Gender Ambiguity Transformation are two different types of excessive
body types that challenge the notion of health in similar but distinct ways.
Body
building challenges the universal notion of health because it falls into the
extreme side of the spectrum of what the average body is. The body that a
person gets from this is due to over training and taking in different
medications to help speed their process for physical strength. The once cliché
phrase that too much of anything is bad, applies very well to the habits of
body builders because they do exactly “too much”. They strive to go beyond what
the average body can do and although to some it is seen as “heroic” or
“breaking free of society’s rules”, when it comes to the body, “too much” is not
heroic, it is detrimental.
In
Stuart Ewens “Hard Bodies”, he takes us a little deeper into the mentality of a
body builder. People who body build
become a slave to their bodies. From the minute they wake up to the minute they
go to sleep all the work that they do is dedicated to their body. What they
choose to eat, where they choose to spend their time, what they choose to do or
not to do, is all in relation to maintaining their specific body. Even slacking
for a single day could ruin all of their months or years of hard work. In “Hard
Bodies”, Ewen uses a 34 year old fictional character named Raymond H to reenact
the life of a body builder. He narrates, “Surveying his work in the mirror,
H—admires the job he has done on his broad, high pectorals, but is quick to
note that his quadriceps “could use some work.” This ambivalence, this mix of
emotions, pursues him each time he comes for a workout, and the times in
between. He is never quite satisfied with the results.” Ewen is describing how
as Raymond works out he is always checking to see the results and while he is
pleased with it for a short amount of time, he is also quick to see his flaws.
This is significant because it highlights the insecurities that arise with body
building and how body builders work so hard attempting to reach an unattainable
goal. It is never enough because you always have to gain more muscle, or become
stronger, and that leads to a loss of judgment about the reality of your
health. Ewen adds on, “An incorrectly struck pose reveals a over measure of
loose skin, a sign of weakness in the shell.” He is highlighting the extent of
the insecurity that comes with bodybuilding and how just the mere strike of an
unpleasant pose could make them unsatisfied with their entire body and cause
them to feel like they are not doing enough.
So
when a body builder is doing everything “right” and they are still not
satisfied with the limitations of the human body what is their last option?
Steroid use. Steroids are simply chemical substances that include different
hormones and vitamins that can be injected into the body in order to give us a
boost in different things such as stamina and strength. Many body builders tend
to resort to this as sometimes their last or even first option because it
allows you to do things with your body that you never imagined you could do. So
why not use steroids if it can make us superhuman? With the use of steroids
body builders can lift things ten times heavier without a single drop of sweat,
and they have ten times the duration that they once had which could help them
achieve their unfeasible goal much faster. In Adrians’ interview with a female
bodybuilder, Roxanne Edwards he asks her about her use of steroids and she
responded saying, “So you’re not going to be stronger because you use a steroid.
You were already strong before you started. A steroid just allows you to do it for a
longer time so you’re able to create more muscle. Now in terms of myself, yeah I have, and the ones that I’ve used
were to make me harder on stage. Twice as hard!” Roxanne is
completely right. Obviously taking steroids does not mean that the person never
had any strength of their own to begin with. And it is great that it makes you feel
undefeatable by granting you this new strength and stamina. However, the issue is that steroids are not
natural, although it is far more complicated than this. Many body builders even
without the use of steroids choose to neglect the fact that their bodies have
limits. So with the use of steroids it only helps to exacerbate their dangerous
mentality by blurring the line between what is possible and impossible for the
human body. What they once knew was impossible has now become possible, even
painless, so they begin to start taking more and more steroids. While living in
this fantasy world they fail to acknowledge the reality of the stress that
their bodies are undergoing due to this artificial substance that is making
them believe their bodies can handle it when in fact, it cannot. When there is
no end goal or limit to your body, and you work it beyond what nature allows,
that is not healthy. The body building mentality is limitless but the human
body is not, and that is where the clash between health and bodybuilding lies.
Ambiguity
gender transformation is another form of excessive body type that challenges
the notion of health. In fact, this body defies the very idea of health in
every single way. In the case of Heather Cassils, she is a female attempting to
achieve a body that cannot clearly be categorized as either male or female. She
did this for approximately six months and it was her effort to undergo a gender
transformation without the actual surgery. In the essay Traditional Sculpture,
she describes her experience by saying, “This project was all about
consumption: my grocery bill sky rocketed to $1,000 a month, my hormones
fluctuated with the androgen I had taken into my body, and my cells tried to
figure out if I was male or female. Let alone the cost of maintaining this
body, injury was imminent, and though I managed to stop before it got too bad,
it was just a matter of time before I was limping around with buckled knees
like all the other bodybuilders.” In order for her to do this she placed her
body under an immeasurable amount of stress with all the pills she was taking
to defy her natural state as well as the amount of food she forced into herself
to maintain this developing body. This body challenges the notion of health
even more than the average body building one because her goal was not just to
work out and maintain muscle, it was to become the extreme stereotype of a
whole other gender. During this time
period Cassils was hardly active due to the stress on her body from the excessive
medications and painful routines day in and day out. She complains, “I was so
tired all the time from all the heavy lifting. My joints ached constantly, and
my muscles became so tight that my girlfriend had to take my t-shirt off at
night because I was no longer flexible enough to do so myself.” Although this
is self explanatory, I must add that despite how muscular, or powerful, all of
the drugs made her in terms of lifting weights, if she could not even remove
her own shirt due to being sore and in pain, how does that in any way reflect
health? Like I mentioned, to be healthy, is to be able to move around, and be
energetic and able bodied. This goal of
gender ambiguity has placed Cassils in the complete opposite direction of
unhealthy. Surprisingly, despite this
all, Cassills still, saw it as a form of achievement. When describing her day
to day interactions and ridicule that she faced she explains her feelings by
stating, “this anger was one of the true indicators of success for me. I had
achieved a confusing body that ruptured expectation.” This demonstrates that
Cassils main goal was not even health itself, rather it was the reactions of
the people who would watch her as they awed in confusion over her physical
appearance. As much as this lifestyle has affected her personally in terms of
her health, it has also had public repercussions. She mentions several times in
the article how in her day to day interaction, she has people trying to either
fight her or test her strength by arm wrestling and other silly things in that
nature. It almost seems as if this was
more of a ‘joke’, or slap in the face towards society and all of us on the
outside world who feel the need to box people into specific bubbles. One could
argue that what motivated Cassils was defying society’s norm of what a male or
female body is. To a certain extent, unlike body building Cassils has reached
her goal- gender ambiguity. Cassils expresses
this time of her life in the article saying, “It was also empowering. At the
peak days of my transformation, I could perform a 650-pound leg press, and I
could bench press 165 pounds. I got respect from the serious meatheads in the
gym, and I was able to split the seams of my shirts (Incredible-Hulk-style). In
total I gained 23 pounds of muscle.” So clearly based on this we can see that
she was able to do some incredible things and enjoyed the superhuman power that
the steroids and workouts gave her. Nevertheless, as I mentioned in the case
with Roxanne Edwards, despite a person gaining a new founded strength and power
it does not change the fact that the way that they went about to get that was an
unnatural and “unhealthy way”.
I could not
emphasize the significance in acknowledging the difference between regular work
outs and excessive body abuse. What Cassils has done to her body for the mere
satisfaction of defying social norms is internal and external bodily harm. She is not healthy due to the mere fact that
her body is being overly worked and she has too many artificial substances in
her body. Six months later Cassils concluded her ‘project’, and she describes
the several after affects of this unhealthy experiment. “I stopped this project
on July 27. On this day I stopped the creatine and the steroids. I stopped
force-feeding myself, and I took two weeks off the weights. Within 14 days I
had shed eight pounds of muscle. My skin grew thick as the testosterone
withdrew from my system. My moods swung.” Her statement alone stresses how
detrimental this physical gender transformation was. The very fact that within
just two weeks of living a normal life, Cassils experienced all of these
negative effects, proves not only the severity of the damage that this was
doing to her body, but also that this gender ambiguity goal does not align with
the notion of health.
In
conclusion, what it means to be healthy is to also be content and feel good
about yourself. What body builders or female body builders in this case do not
have is satisfaction. Working out for them can never be enough, they have to
get bigger and it is like they are chasing a goal that they know can never be
reached. Body building can honestly be perceived as abuse. The amount of food
consumption, steroid usage, and weightlifting, is not one that a human body is should
take. Both woman are trying to do the “impossible” and yes to a certain extent
they are achieving the impossible, however is the impossible healthy? Both
these woman have entered a lifestyle where they are now slaves to their body.
They cannot do anything else, or rest, or have fun because if they do not keep
working for their body they will loose it. The very thing that they place so
much emphasis on and the very place where their happiness lies will be gone. So in actuality, are these lifestyles for
themselves or for the outside world? Are they doing this not to be healthy, but
to send a greater message? It is almost as if they are living less for
themselves and more for others. That in itself is very interesting because woman
like Roxanne want to look good for society so that people can compliment her,
but at the same time she is not following the social norms of what actually
defines a person as healthy or “good looking.” They are the ones who defy
society’s norms and create their own separate lifestyle while we either choose
to admire or reject what they do. As a result of the fact that they do not
follow social norms they’re lives are filled with unique obstacles. They have to deal with constant judgment and
stares from the outside world for not “fitting in”. Whether they are going to
the grocery store or doing laundry, people will always stare because they are
perceived to be “strange”. But most importantly the biggest repercussions on
people such as Roxanne and Cassils are that they have to deal with the constant
judgment from themselves. They place an extraordinary amount of emphasis on
their physical appearance and it almost seems like they mainly live for the
reactions of others. It brings into question whether or not people have these
excessive body types because they genuinely want it, or whether they do it for
reactions. Regardless, the human
body has its limits and we as humans are meant to abide by the laws and rules
of our body for the sake of our health. When you go beyond that, you endanger
yourself in great ways. So as much as people are free to live their lives they
way they want to, both the body building and gender ambiguity lifestyle
challenges the notion of health because it is in fact damaging to ones well
being.
I found your thesis statement to be in your second paragraph, instead of your opening paragraph which I found to be interesting. In both the first two paragraphs, I think you do a good job in clearly defining "health" and coming straight out with saying that, "Bodybuilding challenges the universal notion of health." You also do a good job in clearly asserting as to why it is unhealthy, mentioning that body builders do too much to their bodies, and put too much stress on themselves. You were very confident in your statement as well, making it clear to me as the reader what you were going to be talking about. One suggestion however would be to mention the sources that you would be referencing at the beginning of the paper, instead of bringing them up for the first time at the beginning of their respective paragraphs.
ReplyDeleteI thought that the sources you did choose to write about were very interesting too, as they all circled around the same idea of bodybuilding, but each one had a different approach as to what body building means for them and you did a good job of connecting these three. Another thing that I noticed was that your argument developed through each paragraph, always coming back to your thesis statement. Your use of quotes was especially important in this. For example, in your paragraph about Roxanne Edwards and her steroid use, you had a very appropriate quote that related to what your main idea was concerning Edwards and her notion of health.
One line in your essay stuck out to me the most and that was, "The body building mentality is limitless but the human body is not, and that is where the clash between health and bodybuilding lies." I find this very relateable to all three of your sources, and I think that you should talk about this more in the conclusion to really bring home your main point.
In the conclusion, you mention that a part of being healthy is to "be content and feel good about yourself." Although you believe body builders to be unhealthy, this sort of contradicts your thesis because for example, Roxanne is very content with her life as a body builder and feels great when she is showing off her muscles, so would that technically make her healthy?
Overall, I thought that this was a very strong rough draft with a clear thesis, and many good points that drive home your main idea of the essay.
1. The thesis statement is "Body building and Gender Ambiguity Transformation are two different types of excessive body types that challenge the notion of health in similar but distinct ways."
ReplyDelete2. The thesis statement succeeds at creating a debate. It's interesting because you're able to use three sources to defend your claim, and it is a very strong claim. I don't think you need to change anything about your claim.
3. Throughout the essay, you use "Hard Bodies", Roxanne Edward's interview and H. Cassils video and essay to defend your claim. You discuss body building using "Hard Bodies" and the interview with Roxanne Edwards, and discuss Gender Ambiguity using Heather Cassils strategy. Overall, I think this is a very strong rough draft with not a lot of work left to be done.
4. You have restated your thesis and elaborated on a lot of the things you mentioned in the essay, and more and I believe that is a strong way to end the paper. I am convinced, and I don't think much needs to be changed at all. One thing that strikes me is the way you discuss body building to be unhealthy, however you also say that health is being content with yourself. How is this so? How does it connect?